How does the lifecycle cost of the LGF-PA66 composite electromagnetic flow meter compare with a stainless steel one?
On purchase price alone the two are close at the same size — the real gap opens up over a 10-year op
On purchase price alone the two are close at the same size — the real gap opens up over a 10-year operating cycle.
- Purchase: at DN300 and larger, the LGF-PA66 is usually cheaper; its weight is roughly one-third of the stainless steel version, cutting transport and rigging costs.
- Installation: small and mid-size PA66 meters are handled by hand — no crane rental, and installation time is typically halved.
- Maintenance: stainless bodies rely on linings and exotic electrode alloys for corrosion protection; linings age and peel, electrodes corrode in aggressive media, and shutdown inspections or replacements are typically needed every 3–5 years. PA66's corrosion resistance is the body itself — design life reaches 15+ years in seawater and chemical effluent, with virtually no corrosion-related maintenance.
- Downtime: a failed body means shutting the line; in continuous processes, one day of downtime can cost more than the meter.
For a typical municipal DMA point at DN200, our estimates put the 10-year total cost of ownership of the LGF-PA66 roughly 30%–40% below a 316L stainless steel meter. See our technical documentation for the detailed calculation worksheet.
For more details, please visit our product pages or contact our technical team.
Solution Comparison
Related Questions
LGF-PA66 electromagnetic flow meter vs turbine flow meter: which one should I use for clean water?
Vision-fusion radar vs float-type vs pressure-type level meters: how to choose?
What is the difference between a Doppler radar flowmeter and an ADCP? How to choose between surface and submerged flow measurement?
Doppler radar flowmeter vs. Parshall flume: which is better for open-channel flow measurement?
DN300+ Pipelines: LGF-PA66 Full-Bore vs Insertion Flow Meter